Garmin Vivoactive 6, 42 mm, GPS-Fitness-Smartwatch, Bone/Pink Dawn Metallic
Vor- und Nachteile
von unseren Spezialisten
Die Garmin Vivoactive 6 ist eine GPS-Fitness-Smartwatch mit einem runden 42-Millimeter-Gehäuse. Sie verfügt über ein 1,2-Zoll-Display mit 390 × 390 Pixeln, 8 GB Speicher und eine Akkulaufzeit von bis zu 11 Tagen. Im GPS-Modus beträgt die Laufzeit etwa 14 Stunden. Die Uhr unterstützt GPS, Galileo und GLONASS, misst unter anderem Herzfrequenz und Sauerstoff und ist bis 5 ATM wasserdicht. Das Gehäuse ist 10,9 Millimeter dick und wiegt 23 Gramm.
Bewertungen von Garmin Vivoactive 6, 42 mm, GPS-Fitness-Smartwatch, Bone/Pink Dawn Metallic
Basierend auf 37 Bewertungen
Just purchased this fitness device. I had no idea of how sophisticated it is. On day 2 I am using many more functions than had I imagined. It’s also very lightweight. I am very impressed so far.
Just purchased this fitness device. I had no idea of how sophisticated it is. On day 2 I am using many more functions than had I imagined. It’s also very lightweight. I am very impressed so far.
Billy F
21. Februar 2026
The screen cracked I after lightly bumped the face of the watch into my kitchen counter when I walked past. I’ve only had the watch for three months and after contacting customer service I was told it would cost $120 to replace. The durability of this watch is severely underwhelming.
The screen cracked I after lightly bumped the face of the watch into my kitchen counter when I walked past. I’ve only had the watch for three months and after contacting customer service I was told it would cost $120 to replace. The durability of this watch is severely underwhelming.
Josh22
5. Februar 2026
I have had a vivoactive 3 since August of 2020 and have used it intensively on my road bike, swimming and hiking in the back country. It has been the greatest watch for those activities and I love it. I decided to upgrade to the vivoactive 6 mainly to get more battery life and it is great. Garmin is the best!
I have had a vivoactive 3 since August of 2020 and have used it intensively on my road bike, swimming and hiking in the back country. It has been the greatest watch for those activities and I love it. I decided to upgrade to the vivoactive 6 mainly to get more battery life and it is great. Garmin is the best!
John
23. Januar 2026
After months of frustration with my Fitbit charge, I decided to try a garmin. I wanted the fitness features, not a smart watch necessarily. It has been great! I have exactly what I need. Among other things, it tracks my heart rate correctly, a pet peeve with Fitbit. Attractive, readable, customizable display. And unlike Fitbit , the app is free. Glad I made the switch.
After months of frustration with my Fitbit charge, I decided to try a garmin. I wanted the fitness features, not a smart watch necessarily. It has been great! I have exactly what I need. Among other things, it tracks my heart rate correctly, a pet peeve with Fitbit. Attractive, readable, customizable display. And unlike Fitbit , the app is free. Glad I made the switch.
Active Grandma
6. Dezember 2025
Based on Vivoactive 5.....Heart rate is not just inaccurate, it does not detect exercise and if it eventually does is unstable (sticks at 80, 110 with brief 150 with some wilder excursion to 60 and even 220) under constant exercise) and insensitive to exercise (steady 80 under intense exercise)..Updates seem to make it worse. I have to use it with a chest strap to get anything like reasonable readings. (And chest strap needs a new battery every day if not disconnected.). Battery life is good and it charges quickly. GPS is good, but I have not tested emergency options... Software is fairly easy to navigate. So up to Garmin's usual high standards. But without a reasonable heart rate monitor, I can't see much point in this expensive wrist watch. Maybe Vivoactive 6 is better?
Based on Vivoactive 5.....Heart rate is not just inaccurate, it does not detect exercise and if it eventually does is unstable (sticks at 80, 110 with brief 150 with some wilder excursion to 60 and even 220) under constant exercise) and insensitive to exercise (steady 80 under intense exercise)..Updates seem to make it worse. I have to use it with a chest strap to get anything like reasonable readings. (And chest strap needs a new battery every day if not disconnected.). Battery life is good and it charges quickly. GPS is good, but I have not tested emergency options... Software is fairly easy to navigate. So up to Garmin's usual high standards. But without a reasonable heart rate monitor, I can't see much point in this expensive wrist watch. Maybe Vivoactive 6 is better?
Charles
6. Dezember 2025
