Michelin Ganzjahresreifen CrossClimate+ 185/65R14 XL 90H
Vor- und Nachteile
von unseren Spezialisten
Der Michelin CrossClimate+ 185/65 R14 90H XL ist ein vielseitiger Ganzjahresreifen für Klein- und Kompaktwagen. Tests und Fahrerberichte zeigen, dass diese Dimension die gleichen Stärken wie andere CrossClimate+-Varianten bietet: einen sehr guten Bremsweg und hohe Stabilität auf trockener Fahrbahn sowie sicheres Verhalten auf Nässe. Dank 3PMSF-Kennzeichnung und V-Profil bleibt der Reifen auch bei leichtem Schnee und niedrigen Temperaturen gut nutzbar, was ihn für Regionen mit milden Wintern attraktiv macht. Viele Fahrer berichten von hoher Laufleistung und guter Verschleißfestigkeit, wodurch sich der höhere Kaufpreis teilweise relativiert. Komfort und Geräuschentwicklung werden meist als angenehm und gut kontrollierbar bewertet. Andererseits zeigen Vergleichstests, dass Nassbremsen und Aquaplaningsicherheit nur durchschnittlich im Vergleich zu den besten Ganzjahres- und Winterreifen sind. Außerdem wirkt der Reifen weniger sportlich und direkt als ein reiner Sommerreifen. Für Käufer, die einen sicheren, langlebigen und komfortablen Ganzjahresreifen suchen und einen Aufpreis akzeptieren, ist dieser CrossClimate+ dennoch eine sehr verlässliche Wahl.
Bewertungen von Michelin Ganzjahresreifen CrossClimate+ 185/65R14 XL 90H
Basierend auf 50 Bewertungen
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16. April 2021
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16. April 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12. Januar 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12. Januar 2021
I confirm the positive evaluations expressed previously. Excellent performance and low noise. With the previous tires, the same brand and model, I had traveled about 60,000 km (mainly on state roads). Recommended purchase.
I confirm the positive evaluations expressed previously. Excellent performance and low noise. With the previous tires, the same brand and model, I had traveled about 60,000 km (mainly on state roads). Recommended purchase.
Donato
11. Januar 2020
